Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 12:11

Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Trump Crypto Wallet Goes Dark Following Cease and Desist - Decrypt
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
What are the upcoming trends in artificial intelligence and machine learning?
Russia can stop this any time.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Let’s just make it real clear:
How can people balance religious beliefs with seeking professional mental health care?
Thank you.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Salary you need to live comfortably in Virginia in 2025, according to new study - 13newsnow.com
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
You sound like ChatGPT - The Verge
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Scientists Found Cancer in a Dinosaur – And It Might Help Save Human Lives - ScienceAlert
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
AMD CEO Su turns heads with comments at AI event - TheStreet
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
What’s next?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?